Skip to content

[WIP] [POC] OSDOCS-17637: Updating the machine management index.adoc navigation file#108997

Open
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-17637-mm
Open

[WIP] [POC] OSDOCS-17637: Updating the machine management index.adoc navigation file#108997
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-17637-mm

Conversation

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Mar 25, 2026

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:
https://108997--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/index.html

QE review:
N/A - CQA work, just moving text around, no new technical info

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
  • Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should (just needs shortdesc)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 25, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location

Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 25, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
    - Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
  • Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
  • Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should (just needs shortdesc)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 25, 2026

🤖 Wed Mar 25 18:47:48 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://108997--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/index.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:
https://108997--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/index.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
  • Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should (just needs shortdesc)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: This pull request references OSDOCS-17637 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:
https://108997--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/index.html

QE review:
N/A - CQA work, just moving text around, no new technical info

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.
  • Didn't update the existing machine-api-overview.adoc module that already existed in the assembly - need to check scope of this effort and see if I should (just needs shortdesc)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice POC - I think with a couple tweaks this would work and not be breaking the spirit of the rule or anything 🤓

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 25, 2026

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants