Skip to content

Adding PKO build for SFO#396

Open
npecka wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
npecka:sfo-pko-build
Open

Adding PKO build for SFO#396
npecka wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
npecka:sfo-pko-build

Conversation

@npecka
Copy link
Contributor

@npecka npecka commented Mar 20, 2026

As part of the Konflux migration SFO needs to have the PKO build. Followed the SOP - https://github.com/openshift/ops-sop/blob/master/v4/knowledge_base/olm_to_pko_migration.md as written and will build Konflux component once this change is in.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jaybeeunix and ritmun March 20, 2026 16:01
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: npecka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 20, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.44%. Comparing base (a141ee9) to head (89be91d).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #396   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.44%   72.44%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         704      704           
=======================================
  Hits          510      510           
  Misses        173      173           
  Partials       21       21           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@npecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

npecka commented Mar 20, 2026

/retest

- Update build/Dockerfile to use latest UBI 9.7 image
- Update build/Dockerfile.olm-registry to use latest UBI 9.7 image
- Update CRD with controller-gen v0.20.1

Fixes CI generate-check failure
@npecka
Copy link
Contributor Author

npecka commented Mar 20, 2026

/retest

npecka and others added 2 commits March 20, 2026 13:59
The CI uses controller-gen v0.16.4, so the generated files must use this version.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changed pull_request to pull-request in the PipelineRun name to fix
RFC 1123 validation error: underscores are not allowed in Kubernetes
resource names.

Error was: "metadata.generateName: Invalid value:
'splunk-forwarder-operator-pko-on-pull_request-': a lowercase RFC 1123
subdomain must consist of lower case alphanumeric characters, '-' or '.',
and must start and end with an alphanumeric character"

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2026

@npecka: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants