Conversation
根据组件schema 的 npm.npmrc 配置信息生成内容到 npmrc 文件，以满足私有组件库的自动镜像配置生成
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new plugin, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GA as generateApp
participant DP as DefaultPlugins
participant GN as genNpmrcPlugin
participant FS as FileSystem
GA->>DP: Merge default and custom plugins (includes npmrc)
alt npmrc plugin is configured
GA->>GN: Invoke run method with schema
GN->>FS: Write .npmrc file with generated content
end
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/genNpmrcPlugin.js (2)
70-73: Add validation for empty npmrc entriesThe current implementation doesn't validate that the npmrc entries are not empty or undefined. Also, consider handling the case where the resulting file would be empty.
run(schema) { const npmMirrorList = parseSchema(schema) - this.addFile({ fileType: 'npmrc', fileName, path, fileContent: Array.from(npmMirrorList).join('\n') }, true) + const validEntries = Array.from(npmMirrorList).filter(entry => entry) + if (validEntries.length > 0) { + this.addFile({ fileType: 'npmrc', fileName, path, fileContent: validEntries.join('\n') }, true) + } }
24-55: Consider handling possible newlines in npmrc valuesIf any of the
npmrcvalues already contain newlines, joining them with\ncould result in an improperly formatted.npmrcfile.Consider sanitizing the npmrc entries before adding them to the result set:
function sanitizeNpmrc(npmrc) { // Remove any existing newlines and trim whitespace return npmrc ? npmrc.replace(/\n/g, ' ').trim() : ''; } // Then use this function when adding to resNpmMirror resNpmMirror.add(sanitizeNpmrc(npmrc))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/vue-generator/src/generator/generateApp.js(4 hunks)packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/genNpmrcPlugin.js(1 hunks)packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/index.js(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/index.js (1)
13-13: LGTM!The addition of the
genNpmrcPluginexport follows the established pattern of the other plugin exports in this file.packages/vue-generator/src/generator/generateApp.js (4)
13-15: LGTM!The import of
genNpmrcPluginis correctly added to the existing list of plugin imports.
36-37: LGTM!The
npmrcplugin is properly added to thedefaultPluginsobject, following the same pattern as other plugins.
52-52: LGTM!The
npmrcproperty is correctly added to the destructuredcustomPluginsobject.
64-64: LGTM!The
npmrcplugin is properly included in themergeWithDefaultPluginobject, using the same pattern as other plugins.packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/genNpmrcPlugin.js (6)
1-7: LGTM!The imports and default options are properly defined for the plugin.
9-22: LGTM!The
getComponentsSethelper function correctly extracts component names from the page and block schemas and returns a unique set of components.
29-33: Check the condition in the componentsMap loopThere's a logical inconsistency here. You're checking if
!resNpmMirror.has(packageName)but then addingnpmrcto the set, notpackageName. This could lead to duplicated npmrc entries if different packages have the same npmrc configuration.Consider modifying the code to either:
- Keep track of both
packageNameandnpmrcto properly avoid duplicates- Verify that this behavior is intentional
- if (packageName && !resNpmMirror.has(packageName) && componentsSet.has(componentName)) { + if (packageName && npmrc && !resNpmMirror.has(npmrc) && componentsSet.has(componentName)) { resNpmMirror.add(npmrc) }
35-41: Similar inconsistency in the packages loopThe same issue exists in this loop. You check
!resNpmMirror.has(packageName)but addnpmrcto the set.- if (packageName && !resNpmMirror.has(packageName)) { + if (packageName && npmrc && !resNpmMirror.has(npmrc)) { resNpmMirror.add(npmrc) }
43-52: Similar issue in the utils loopAgain, there's a mismatch between what's checked (
packageName) and what's added to the set (npmrc).- if (type !== 'npm' || resNpmMirror.has(packageName)) { + if (type !== 'npm' || !npmrc || resNpmMirror.has(npmrc)) { continue }
57-77: LGTM!The main plugin function follows the correct structure for plugins in this system, with name, description, and a run method that handles the file generation.
|
需要 可以考虑抽取出来作为独立的出码插件，用户按需配置。 |
There may not be many scenarios that require It can be considered to extract it as an independent code output plug-in and configure it on demand by users. |
3 participants
根据组件schema 的 npm.npmrc 配置信息生成内容到 npmrc 文件，以满足私有组件库的自动镜像配置生成
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
给组件 schema 增加 npmrc 配置信息后，可以自动生成 .npmrc 配置文件，解决出码后私有组件库无法安装的问题
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit