Conversation
|
Tested, works as expected, this brings additional milter headers configured in rspamd, such as "X-Spam-Level", would be great to see this PR #52 merged 👍 |
|
+1 to what @paukstis said. is there anything we can do to help get this merged? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix for issue #51
The idea is, basically: don't use a headers whitelist, only give a fixed order to:
In order to be RFC8617-compliant, and shift all other headers after, in the ordering specified by rspamd.
This should support the insertion of any header by the
milter_headersmodule, without additional user config.