Skip to content

Update dependency SharpZipLib to v1.4.2#51

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/sharpziplib-1.x
Open

Update dependency SharpZipLib to v1.4.2#51
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/sharpziplib-1.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 17, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
SharpZipLib nuget minor 1.3.3 -> 1.4.2

Release Notes

icsharpcode/SharpZipLib (SharpZipLib)

v1.4.2

New patch release that further fixes issues with the changes in v1.4.0.

Fixes:

Other changes (not related to library code):

v1.4.1

New patch release that mainly fixes issues with the changes in v1.4.0.

ZIP String Encoding:

Further iteration on the StringCodec API, since the released version was confusing to use and in some cases could not be used without causing deprecation warnings.

TAR:

Two issues that could cause deadlocks was found in v1.4.0, one due to a typo in the async implementation and one due to a buffer not being cleared.

Async:

General async speed improvement, since we now correctly opt out of requiring to continue in the same context (ConfigureAwait(false)).

Other changes (not related to library code):

v1.4.0

New minor release focusing on async and supporting newer frameworks.

Note that this version drops support for the EOL .NET 4.5 Framework, but adding explicit support for .NET 6.

Features:

Fixes:

Other changes (not related to library code):


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants