-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
Fix missing union keyword highlighting in source pages #3233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
SergioChan
wants to merge
4
commits into
rust-lang:main
from
SergioChan:fix-union-keyword-highlighting
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4bb61a0
fix(syntax): highlight Rust union keyword in source view
SergioChan 693d4a4
fix(rust syntax): treat union as contextual keyword
SergioChan e962d49
test(rust): cover weak union keyword cases
SergioChan 7862ec3
test(rust): assert weak union usages are not keyword-highlighted
SergioChan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -135,4 +135,30 @@ mod tests { | |
| let highlighted = with_lang(Some("toml"), &text, None); | ||
| assert!(highlighted.starts_with("<p>\n")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn rust_union_is_highlighted_as_keyword() { | ||
| let highlighted = with_lang(Some("rust"), "union Foo { field: u8 }\n", None); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please add more test cases like the one I provided. Also: struct X {
union: u32,
}
let x = X { union: 0 };macro_rules! union {
() => {}
}
union!(); |
||
| assert!(highlighted.contains("<span class=\"syntax-keyword\">union</span> Foo")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn rust_union_identifier_is_not_highlighted_as_keyword() { | ||
| let highlighted = with_lang( | ||
| Some("rust"), | ||
| "struct X { union: u32 }\nlet x = X { union: 0 };\nprintln!(\"{}\", x.union);\n", | ||
| None, | ||
| ); | ||
| assert!(highlighted.contains("union:")); | ||
| assert!(highlighted.contains("x.union")); | ||
| assert!(!highlighted.contains("<span class=\"syntax-keyword\">union</span>:")); | ||
| assert!(!highlighted.contains(".<span class=\"syntax-keyword\">union</span>")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn rust_union_macro_name_is_not_highlighted_as_keyword() { | ||
| let highlighted = with_lang(Some("rust"), "macro_rules! union { () => {} }\nunion!();\n", None); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same here. |
||
| assert!(highlighted.contains("macro_rules! union")); | ||
| assert!(!highlighted.contains("<span class=\"syntax-keyword\">union</span>!")); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's wrong.