fix(explicit_counter_loop): suggest .take(n) for for _ in 0..n co…#16658
Merged
Jarcho merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Mar 27, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @Jarcho rustbot has assigned @Jarcho. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
ae45101 to
6fe961a
Compare
Jarcho
reviewed
Mar 4, 2026
6fe961a to
07123db
Compare
07123db to
9303cb9
Compare
…unter loops fix(explicit_counter_loop): suggest `.take(n)` for `for _ in 0..n` counter loops
9303cb9 to
daad0fb
Compare
Jarcho
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a loop variable is unused (
for _ in 0..n) and the counter is beingincremented, Clippy previously suggested the generic zip-based rewrite.
This PR adds a more idiomatic
.take(n)suggestion for the common casewhere the range is half-open and starts at zero:
Non-zero starts (
5..MAX) and inclusive ranges (0..=MAX) areexplicitly excluded and fall through to the existing zip suggestion.
Both cases are covered by new UI tests.
changelog: [
explicit_counter_loop]: suggest(init..).take(n)when loop variable is unused and range is0..nfixes #16642