Remove TyCtxt::node_lint method and rustc_middle::lint_level function#153663
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 5 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Mar 11, 2026
Merged
Remove TyCtxt::node_lint method and rustc_middle::lint_level function#153663rust-bors[bot] merged 5 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
TyCtxt::node_lint method and rustc_middle::lint_level function#153663rust-bors[bot] merged 5 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
JonathanBrouwer
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2026
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
migrate-diag
branch
from
b562755 to
2765e4a
Compare
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
…athanBrouwer Remove `TyCtxt::node_lint` method and `rustc_middle::lint_level` function Part of rust-lang#153099. With this PR, we can finally get rid of `lint_level`. \o/ r? @JonathanBrouwer
This was referenced Mar 10, 2026
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #153560 (Introduce granular tidy_ctx's check in extra_checks) - #153666 (Add a regression test for #153599) - #153493 (Remove `FromCycleError` trait) - #153549 (tests/ui/binop: add annotations for reference rules) - #153641 (Move `Spanned`.) - #153663 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_lint` method and `rustc_middle::lint_level` function) - #153664 (Add test for #109804)
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #153560 (Introduce granular tidy_ctx's check in extra_checks) - #153666 (Add a regression test for #153599) - #153493 (Remove `FromCycleError` trait) - #153549 (tests/ui/binop: add annotations for reference rules) - #153641 (Move `Spanned`.) - #153663 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_lint` method and `rustc_middle::lint_level` function) - #153664 (Add test for #109804)
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #153560 (Introduce granular tidy_ctx's check in extra_checks) - #153666 (Add a regression test for #153599) - #153493 (Remove `FromCycleError` trait) - #153549 (tests/ui/binop: add annotations for reference rules) - #153641 (Move `Spanned`.) - #153663 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_lint` method and `rustc_middle::lint_level` function) - #153664 (Add test for #109804)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
Rollup merge of #153663 - GuillaumeGomez:migrate-diag, r=JonathanBrouwer Remove `TyCtxt::node_lint` method and `rustc_middle::lint_level` function Part of #153099. With this PR, we can finally get rid of `lint_level`. \o/ r? @JonathanBrouwer
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #153099.
With this PR, we can finally get rid of
lint_level. \o/r? @JonathanBrouwer