Skip to content

docs: add OCC store layer optimization analysis#2842

Merged
pdrobnjak merged 1 commit intoperf/syncpool-cachekv-storesfrom
docs/occ-store-layer-analysis
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

docs: add OCC store layer optimization analysis#2842
pdrobnjak merged 1 commit intoperf/syncpool-cachekv-storesfrom
docs/occ-store-layer-analysis

Conversation

@pdrobnjak
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Add documentation analyzing the OCC store layer and optimization opportunities

Stack

7/13 — depends on perf/gogc-200

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2026

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Buf / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed✅ passedFeb 11, 2026, 1:20 PM

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.72%. Comparing base (79ed1e9) to head (2f87209).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           perf/gogc-200    #2842       +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage          58.21%   68.72%   +10.50%     
==================================================
  Files                365        5      -360     
  Lines              35004      454    -34550     
==================================================
- Hits               20379      312    -20067     
+ Misses             12612      113    -12499     
+ Partials            2013       29     -1984     
Flag Coverage Δ
sei-db 68.72% <ø> (ø)
sei-tendermint ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 360 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Benchmark results and commit breakdown for the store-layer
optimizations yielding +20% median TPS on EVM transfer workloads.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pdrobnjak pdrobnjak force-pushed the docs/occ-store-layer-analysis branch from 2f87209 to 4fcb74a Compare February 11, 2026 13:19
Base automatically changed from perf/gogc-200 to perf/syncpool-cachekv-stores February 11, 2026 13:19
@pdrobnjak pdrobnjak merged commit 4fcb74a into perf/syncpool-cachekv-stores Feb 11, 2026
@pdrobnjak pdrobnjak deleted the docs/occ-store-layer-analysis branch February 11, 2026 13:19
@pdrobnjak pdrobnjak restored the docs/occ-store-layer-analysis branch February 11, 2026 13:22
@pdrobnjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR was auto-merged by GitHub during a stack reorder (branch force-push made head appear merged into base). No code was actually merged to main. This PR has been superseded — see the restacked PR chain starting at #2849.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments