Skip to content

PreCourse1Complete#2407

Open
sundeep4sandy wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
sundeep4sandy:master
Open

PreCourse1Complete#2407
sundeep4sandy wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
sundeep4sandy:master

Conversation

@sundeep4sandy
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Overall, the student has implemented three exercises related to data structures: a stack using an array (Exercise_1), a stack using a linked list (Exercise_2), and a linked list with insertion and printing (Exercise_3).

Strengths:

  • The code is generally readable and well-structured.
  • The stack implementations (Exercise_1 and Exercise_2) include basic operations (push, pop, peek, isEmpty) and handle edge cases like stack overflow/underflow with console messages.
  • The linked list implementation (Exercise_3) correctly inserts nodes at the end and prints the list.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Exercise_1 (Stack using array):

    • The stack uses a fixed size (MAX=1000), which might not be flexible. Consider making the stack dynamic or allowing the user to specify the size.
    • The pop and peek methods return 0 in case of underflow/empty, which might be ambiguous if 0 is a valid stack element. It would be better to return null or undefined or throw an exception.
    • The time and space complexity for all operations (push, pop, peek, isEmpty) are O(1). This should be noted in the code as per the requirement.
  2. Exercise_2 (Stack using linked list):

    • The push method does not check for allocation failure (though in JavaScript, memory allocation is managed, but it's good to note).
    • Similar to Exercise_1, returning 0 for underflow/empty might be problematic. Consider returning null or undefined.
    • The stackNode class is defined as a static property, which is acceptable but not necessary. It could be defined outside or as a non-static inner class.
    • Time and space complexity: push, pop, peek, and isEmpty are all O(1). This should be documented.
  3. Exercise_3 (Linked list):

    • The insert method requires passing the list as an argument, but since it's a method of the LinkedList class, it should operate on this instead. The current design is awkward because the method is called with list.insert(list, data). It should be list.insert(data) and use this internally.
    • The printList method similarly takes list as an argument but should use this.
    • The insertion method has O(n) time complexity for each insertion because it traverses to the end. To improve efficiency, consider maintaining a tail pointer.
    • The code lacks comments for time and space complexity as required.

General:

  • The problem asks to include time and space complexity at the top of each file, which is missing in all three exercises.
  • The code uses console.log for messages (like "Stack Overflow") which might not be ideal for all applications (e.g., if the stack is used in a non-console environment). Consider handling errors differently.
  • There are no tests for edge cases (e.g., popping from an empty stack multiple times), but the code seems to handle them.

Overall, the solutions are functionally correct for basic operations but could be improved in terms of design (e.g., using this in methods) and error handling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants