Skip to content

upcoming: [UIE-10429] - Reserved IP: Implement Empty Landing state.#13521

Open
tanushree-akamai wants to merge 2 commits intolinode:developfrom
tanushree-akamai:feature/UIE-10429-ReservedIP-empty-landing-state
Open

upcoming: [UIE-10429] - Reserved IP: Implement Empty Landing state.#13521
tanushree-akamai wants to merge 2 commits intolinode:developfrom
tanushree-akamai:feature/UIE-10429-ReservedIP-empty-landing-state

Conversation

@tanushree-akamai
Copy link
Contributor

Description 📝

Implement Empty Landing state for Reserved IPs.

Changes 🔄

  • Add empty landing state
  • Add landing state data

Scope 🚢

Upon production release, changes in this PR will be visible to:

  • All customers
  • Some customers (e.g. in Beta or Limited Availability)
  • No customers / Not applicable

Target release date 🗓️

April 30, 2026

Preview 📷

Screenshot 2026-03-24 at 1 56 50 PM

How to test 🧪

Prerequisites

  • Toggle on Reserve IP feature from Dev Tools

Verification steps

  • Navigate to /reserved-ips
Author Checklists

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All tests and CI checks are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

Comment on lines +32 to +33
wide={true}
youtubeLinkData={youtubeLinkData}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
wide={true}
youtubeLinkData={youtubeLinkData}
wide

if there are no YT videos and it isn't clear at this point if there will be, I think it's better to remove that section by not passing that prop.

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants