-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
feat(coverm/{contig,genome}): add bam output #11111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
959c98d
feat: add bam output to coverm/contig
dialvarezs 751c5e9
chore: quotes
dialvarezs 3ac57f6
chore: update meta
dialvarezs df75c2c
Merge branch 'master' into update-coverm
dialvarezs bc9c71b
chore: fix meta
dialvarezs 48b24d5
Merge branch 'update-coverm' of github.com:dialvarezs/nf-core-modules…
dialvarezs 28f9fcd
chore: format meta
dialvarezs 070a01b
feat: add bam output to coverm/genome
dialvarezs aee6710
chore: meta fmt
dialvarezs abfac8a
chore: meta input fix
dialvarezs 303e363
fix: meta input order
dialvarezs 34144bf
fix: include bam filenames only for stability
dialvarezs 93aea6c
chore: re-freeze container
dialvarezs f0784b9
chore: reorder inputs, add ontologies
dialvarezs 199961c
fix: snapshot parameters
dialvarezs f2280c4
feat: improve snapshots and unify naming
dialvarezs 44b6b2c
feat: add reads checksum from bam
dialvarezs d9d71aa
Merge branch 'master' into update-coverm
prototaxites File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we put all these inputs into one tuple? That will make sure you're sure that EVERY time everything comes together in the right combination.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean this?
I'm not so sure about that. In my opinion that would introduce extra complexity in the workflows, because you will have to build the channel by joining/combinig all together.
And other similar modules use this pattern too: minimap2, bwa, bowtie. All of them separates the reads, the reference and additional flags as separate inputs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get that, we just try to converge more on that because the combine statements make sure that the channels do not get mixed up, but its more of a goal and not something I would enforce here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's a bad idea to put most of these as a single input, as they're sample-dependent
vals - but presumablyenable_bam_outputis something you'd want to configure once as a single input?